Apparently, outlining became far less sad after Property.
Your pictures are obviously still welcome (whether I know you or not). Send your pictures or videos to cryingwhileoutlining@gmail.com.
Thursday, April 30, 2009
Saturday, April 25, 2009
Thursday, April 23, 2009
This is why I cry
Please enjoy this excerpt from an email from my Property professor to better understand why this class drives me to tears. This has not been edited by me in any way, shape, or form:
Shelley ought not to apply as "lawful" seems to exclude from heirs bastard kids of a female ancestor, but the cases ignored this, so Shelly could mean Al got a fee. If Shelkley does apply and Al got a fee, under the indefintie fialure oif issue interperetaitono(great mioritynw), it is a fee tail. Maj: it is a fee subject to condition a fee subject to exec itnereset Worhteri Title preusption is not an issue unless a remnaidner is involved. If Shelley does not apply, there is a remainder "Reverter" actually sweems tos trentghten the case for WT, as if O wanted his heirs to take as porucahserws he would not have used the term, associaredwith aretaiend inerest by him. So WT does apoply and O has a reversion If Shelleydoes not apply, Al got lfie estate, his heirs got a cont rem (msurt suirvive Al and be clsoesat relaive) reversions are alienablew by will, so if O hadone it went to Sue
Shelley ought not to apply as "lawful" seems to exclude from heirs bastard kids of a female ancestor, but the cases ignored this, so Shelly could mean Al got a fee. If Shelkley does apply and Al got a fee, under the indefintie fialure oif issue interperetaitono(great mioritynw), it is a fee tail. Maj: it is a fee subject to condition a fee subject to exec itnereset Worhteri Title preusption is not an issue unless a remnaidner is involved. If Shelley does not apply, there is a remainder "Reverter" actually sweems tos trentghten the case for WT, as if O wanted his heirs to take as porucahserws he would not have used the term, associaredwith aretaiend inerest by him. So WT does apoply and O has a reversion If Shelleydoes not apply, Al got lfie estate, his heirs got a cont rem (msurt suirvive Al and be clsoesat relaive) reversions are alienablew by will, so if O hadone it went to Sue
Crying While Outlining: Celebrity Edition
From the files of the Harvard Law Review!
You probably were not aware that Britney went to law school. Now you know.
(Props to Lauren for the skillz)
Crying While Outlining: Suicide Edition
Note: the authors of this blog strongly condemn suicide (unless, of course, it's done while holding a Gilbert's guide to Property). Your comments on the implications of this in Criminal Law (duress?) would be greatly appreciated since that's my second final.
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Crying While Reading Property Notes
An excerpt from an email to our Property class: "forcing a buyer to vioalte the resgtrictinve cxovenant by taking a deed in order to dcause the right of firsyt refusal opotion"
Crying in French While Outlining
This one came with this message:
and the best part? Today on Campus: free beer, free food, free ben
folds, free girl talk, 80 degrees and sunny. Long Live the Cubicle.
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
CryingWhileNOTGunning.com
Editor's note: because I have personally voted Jeff "most likely to go on a shooting rampage during finals," I'd like to rescind the earlier labeling of Jeff as a gunner. He is a totally normal student who spends 18 hours a day in the library study rooms. Totally normal.
Property
Please feel free to send me your CryingWhileOutlining submissions at cryingwhileoutlining@gmail.com if you feel the same way I do about outlining.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
