Just remember: Grades don't come out 'til the New Year!
Sunday, December 12, 2010
Saturday, December 11, 2010
Crying While Contemplating Suicide
Monday, December 6, 2010
Saturday, December 4, 2010
Crying While Outlining While Eating My Sorrows Away
Friday, December 3, 2010
Sunday, April 25, 2010
Sunday, April 11, 2010
J'suis triste while outlining
Monday, December 14, 2009
Crying While Wearing Enormous Headphones
Sunday, December 13, 2009
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
Monday, December 7, 2009
Saturday, December 5, 2009
Crying in Sepia
Crying on a Can of Campbell's Soup
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Thursday, April 30, 2009
Still accepting your submissions...
Apparently, outlining became far less sad after Property.
Your pictures are obviously still welcome (whether I know you or not). Send your pictures or videos to cryingwhileoutlining@gmail.com.
Your pictures are obviously still welcome (whether I know you or not). Send your pictures or videos to cryingwhileoutlining@gmail.com.
Saturday, April 25, 2009
Thursday, April 23, 2009
This is why I cry
Please enjoy this excerpt from an email from my Property professor to better understand why this class drives me to tears. This has not been edited by me in any way, shape, or form:
Shelley ought not to apply as "lawful" seems to exclude from heirs bastard kids of a female ancestor, but the cases ignored this, so Shelly could mean Al got a fee. If Shelkley does apply and Al got a fee, under the indefintie fialure oif issue interperetaitono(great mioritynw), it is a fee tail. Maj: it is a fee subject to condition a fee subject to exec itnereset Worhteri Title preusption is not an issue unless a remnaidner is involved. If Shelley does not apply, there is a remainder "Reverter" actually sweems tos trentghten the case for WT, as if O wanted his heirs to take as porucahserws he would not have used the term, associaredwith aretaiend inerest by him. So WT does apoply and O has a reversion If Shelleydoes not apply, Al got lfie estate, his heirs got a cont rem (msurt suirvive Al and be clsoesat relaive) reversions are alienablew by will, so if O hadone it went to Sue
Shelley ought not to apply as "lawful" seems to exclude from heirs bastard kids of a female ancestor, but the cases ignored this, so Shelly could mean Al got a fee. If Shelkley does apply and Al got a fee, under the indefintie fialure oif issue interperetaitono(great mioritynw), it is a fee tail. Maj: it is a fee subject to condition a fee subject to exec itnereset Worhteri Title preusption is not an issue unless a remnaidner is involved. If Shelley does not apply, there is a remainder "Reverter" actually sweems tos trentghten the case for WT, as if O wanted his heirs to take as porucahserws he would not have used the term, associaredwith aretaiend inerest by him. So WT does apoply and O has a reversion If Shelleydoes not apply, Al got lfie estate, his heirs got a cont rem (msurt suirvive Al and be clsoesat relaive) reversions are alienablew by will, so if O hadone it went to Sue
Crying While Outlining: Celebrity Edition
Crying While Outlining: Suicide Edition
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)